Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean4.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Mean with known Variance - Sample Size
Date of computationThu, 13 Nov 2008 07:35:43 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/13/t1226586995g7rm5li75uhlxog.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 11:49:33 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24626, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 11:49:33 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact124
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [Workshop 2] [2008-11-13 14:35:43] [51c0bf2e8d2e36d7824d95d26ff0a48d] [Current]
F         [Testing Mean with known Variance - Sample Size] [testing mean with...] [2008-11-13 19:47:06] [98f6eecc397b06503dbf024e1e936f30]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-14 16:19:00 [407693b66d7f2e0b350979005057872d] [reply
Deze vraag is volledig correct omdat:
We gaan het aantal stalen dat er gaan onderzoeken vergroten met 32466.5. Dit is echter niet haalbaar en niet realistisch. Dit kost echter te veel tijd en geld. Maar als we de variantie gaan verlagen gaat de kans dat we de fraude gaan ontdekken groter worden.

2008-11-14 16:19:28 [407693b66d7f2e0b350979005057872d] [reply
Deze vraag is volledig correct omdat:
We gebruiken de one-sided confidence interval van de right-tail, omdat enkel de afwijking van het vetpercentage naar boven toe een economisch voordeel voor de producent kan betekenen.
We gebruiken hier de rechter staart omdat deze nauwkeuriger is omdat de volledige foutmarge van 5% zich in deze staart bevindt. (bij de two-sided confidence interval wordt de 5% verdeeld over zowel de linkse als de rechtse staart, wat de resultaten van de two-sided extremer maakt)
De sample-mean ligt onder0.189276559191704 dus binnen het betrouwbaarheidinterval van 95%.
2008-11-17 20:19:14 [Steven Vercammen] [reply
Het antwoord is juist. Uit de tabel kunnen we afleiden dat we, om zulke lage kans op type 1 en 2 errors aan te houden, de sample size zeer sterk moeten verhogen (van 27 naar 32467). Dit zou echter zoveel tijd en geld kosten dat dit niet haalbaar is.

Post a new message




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24626&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24626&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24626&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132







Testing Mean with known Variance
population variance0.012
null hypothesis about mean0.15
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
type I error0.05
type II error0.05
sample size32466.5214491449

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
null hypothesis about mean & 0.15 \tabularnewline
alternative hypothesis about mean & 0.152 \tabularnewline
type I error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
type II error & 0.05 \tabularnewline
sample size & 32466.5214491449 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24626&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]null hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.15[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]alternative hypothesis about mean[/C][C]0.152[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type I error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]type II error[/C][C]0.05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]sample size[/C][C]32466.5214491449[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24626&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24626&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Mean with known Variance
population variance0.012
null hypothesis about mean0.15
alternative hypothesis about mean0.152
type I error0.05
type II error0.05
sample size32466.5214491449



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 0.15 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.05 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 0.15 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.05 ; par5 = 0.05 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
par5<-as.numeric(par5)
c <- 'NA'
csn <- abs(qnorm(par5))
if (par2 == par3)
{
conclusion <- 'Error: the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis must not be equal.'
}
ua <- abs(qnorm(par4))
ub <- qnorm(par5)
c <- (par2+ua/ub*(-par3))/(1-(ua/ub))
sqrtn <- ua*sqrt(par1)/(c - par2)
samplesize <- sqrtn * sqrtn
ua
ub
c
sqrtn
samplesize
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'null hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'alternative hypothesis about mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type I error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'type II error',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par5)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#ex4','sample size','example'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,samplesize)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')