FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_hypothesismean6.wasp
Title produced by softwareTesting Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval
Date of computationWed, 12 Nov 2008 03:52:33 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/12/t1226487227v5w4apb00sdzsok.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 11:49:42 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24101, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 11:49:42 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact233

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Testing Sample Mean with known Variance - Confidence Interval] [Q6 pork] [2008-11-12 10:52:33] [b09437381d488816ab9f5cf07e347c02] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-19 16:39:06 [Ken Wright] [reply] 
zelfde besluit als de vorige vraag; right tailed omwille van het economisch voordeel voor de leverancier en als besluit dat 0.152>0.18, dus deze sample mean in het confidence interval 95% ligt
2008-11-23 17:10:08 [Aurélie Van Impe] [reply] 
Hetzelfde besluit als in vraag 5. We gebruiken de rechterstaart, omdat enkel teveel vet een economisch voordeel kan opleveren voor de leverancier. Het gemiddelde van de steekproef, 0.1546, ligt lager dan 0.1893, en dus binnen het 95%-betrouwbaarheidsinterval.
2008-11-23 18:31:28 [c97d2ae59c98cf77a04815c1edffab5a] [reply] 
de student heeft geen besluit kunnen vormen, maar wel de juiste gegevens ingevuld.
mijn conclusie:
We kunnen kiezen tussen een 1-tailed en 2-tailed interval, afhankelijk van onze verklaring.
Ook al veranderen we de nulhypothese van 15% in 15,2%, dan nog ligt het steekproefgemiddelde van 15,46% tussen een vetpercentage van 11.06% en 19.33% en dus binnen het 2-zijdig betrouwbaarheidsinterval van 95%. Dit geldt wanneer we besluiten dat het vetpercentage niet te veel of te weinig mag zijn. Het vetpercentage mag niet onder de grens van 11,06% gaan en de 19,33% niet overschrijden. Zo wel? => fraude
In het geval van het vermoeden van fraude, omdat dit enkel een economisch voordeel kan opleveren voor de leverancier, is er enkel een afwijking naar boven en maken we gebruik van het ‘Right one-sided confidence interval at 0.95’. hierbij kunnen we afleiden dat 15,46% nog altijd binnen het betrouwbaarheidsinterval [–inf, 18,67%]. En de nulhypothese dus niet verworpen moet worden. Hierbij mag het vetpercentage de 18,67% niet overschrijden. zo wel?=> fraude
2008-11-24 18:41:23 [Ellen Van den Broeck] [reply] 
Ook hier geldt weer: Je moet enkel kijken naar de Right one-sided confidence interval, dit omdat het vetpercentage enkel te groot kan zijn. 15,46% is kleiner als 18,6% en ligt dus binnen het betrouwbaarheidsinterval.

Post a new message

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24101&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24101&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24101&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135






Testing Sample Mean with known Variance
Population variance0.012
Sample size27
Null hypothesis (H0)0.152
Confidence interval0.95
Type of IntervalLeft tailRight tail
Two-sided confidence interval at 0.950.1106803311796960.193319668820304
Left one-sided confidence interval at 0.950.117323440808296+inf
Right one-sided confidence interval at 0.95-inf0.186676559191704
more information about confidence interval

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Testing Sample Mean with known Variance \tabularnewline
Population variance & 0.012 \tabularnewline
Sample size & 27 \tabularnewline
Null hypothesis (H0) & 0.152 \tabularnewline
Confidence interval & 0.95 \tabularnewline
Type of Interval & Left tail & Right tail \tabularnewline
Two-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & 0.110680331179696 & 0.193319668820304 \tabularnewline
Left one-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & 0.117323440808296 & +inf \tabularnewline
Right one-sided confidence interval at  0.95 & -inf & 0.186676559191704 \tabularnewline
more information about confidence interval \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24101&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Testing Sample Mean with known Variance[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Population variance[/C][C]0.012[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Sample size[/C][C]27[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Null hypothesis (H0)[/C][C]0.152[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Confidence interval[/C][C]0.95[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Type of Interval[/C][C]Left tail[/C][C]Right tail[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Two-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]0.110680331179696[/C][C]0.193319668820304[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Left one-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]0.117323440808296[/C][C]+inf[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Right one-sided confidence interval at  0.95[/C][C]-inf[/C][C]0.186676559191704[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]more information about confidence interval[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24101&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=24101&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Testing Sample Mean with known Variance
Population variance0.012
Sample size27
Null hypothesis (H0)0.152
Confidence interval0.95
Type of IntervalLeft tailRight tail
Two-sided confidence interval at 0.950.1106803311796960.193319668820304
Left one-sided confidence interval at 0.950.117323440808296+inf
Right one-sided confidence interval at 0.95-inf0.186676559191704
more information about confidence interval


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 27 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.95 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 0.012 ; par2 = 27 ; par3 = 0.152 ; par4 = 0.95 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1<-as.numeric(par1)
par2<-as.numeric(par2)
par3<-as.numeric(par3)
par4<-as.numeric(par4)
sigma <- sqrt(par1)
sqrtn <- sqrt(par2)
ua <- par3 - abs(qnorm((1-par4)/2))* sigma / sqrtn
ub <- par3 + abs(qnorm((1-par4)/2))* sigma / sqrtn
ua
ub
ul <- par3 - qnorm(par4) * sigma / sqrtn
ul
ur <- par3 + qnorm(par4) * sigma / sqrtn
ur
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm','Testing Sample Mean with known Variance','learn more about Statistical Hypothesis Testing about the Mean when the Variance is known'),3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Population variance',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par1,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Sample size',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par2,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Null hypothesis (H0)',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par3,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Confidence interval',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,par4,2)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Type of Interval',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Left tail',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Right tail',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Two-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,ua)
a<-table.element(a,ub)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Left one-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,ul)
a<-table.element(a,'+inf')
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,paste('Right one-sided confidence interval at ',par4), header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'-inf')
a<-table.element(a,ur)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a, hyperlink('ht_mean_knownvar.htm#ex6', 'more information about confidence interval','example'),3,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')