Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_bootstrapplot.wasp
Title produced by softwareBlocked Bootstrap Plot - Central Tendency
Date of computationMon, 03 Nov 2008 11:15:43 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/03/t1225736229our1tn44gdolmsb.htm/, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:43:31 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20932, Retrieved Sun, 19 May 2024 10:43:31 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact167
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F     [Mean Plot] [workshop 3] [2007-10-26 12:14:28] [e9ffc5de6f8a7be62f22b142b5b6b1a8]
F RMPD    [Blocked Bootstrap Plot - Central Tendency] [Blocked Bootstrap...] [2008-11-03 18:15:43] [d592f629d96b926609f311957d74fcca] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-06 15:04:50 [Tom Ardies] [reply
Je kan in feite kiezen tussen de midrange en de mean. Persoonlijk ga ik voor de mean omdat deze minder last heeft van outliers.
2008-11-07 16:29:23 [Jan Van Riet] [reply
Hier is het gebruik van de midrange het meest aangewezen als gemiddelde omdat hierbij de variantie het kleinst is, ondanks de aanwezige outliers. Een oplossing hiervoor is het rekenkundig gemiddelde te nemen en de outliers te verwijderen in de dataset.
2008-11-09 20:09:55 [Tamara Witters] [reply
Je oplossing is juist maar niet volledig.

Verbetering:
Eerst kijken we de simultation of mean met midrange and median. Daaruit kunnen we afleiden dat midrange een duidelijk patroon heeft en dan de median. Een duidelijk patroon wijst op minder variantie, waardoor er meer nauwkeurigheid is.
Als we kijken naar de bootstrap simulation – central tendency dan zien we dat de median het grootste aantal outliers heeft. Outliers zijn relevant bij onze bevindingen!
We kunnen dus besluiten dat de mean en de midrange beiden goede schatters zijn.


2008-11-09 23:54:33 [Kevin Neelen] [reply
Er kan gebruik gemaakt worden van de midrange, aangezien daar de varantie het kleinst is (ondanks de aanwezigheid van enkele outliers). Maar in sommige gevallen is het misschien raadzamer om gebruik te maken van een methode waarbij minder outliers aanwezig zijn om zo tot de beste estimator te komen. Vandaar dat mean ook zeker niet altijd een foute oplossing hoeft te zijn.

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
109.20
88.60
94.30
98.30
86.40
80.60
104.10
108.20
93.40
71.90
94.10
94.90
96.40
91.10
84.40
86.40
88.00
75.10
109.70
103.00
82.10
68.00
96.40
94.30
90.00
88.00
76.10
82.50
81.40
66.50
97.20
94.10
80.70
70.50
87.80
89.50
99.60
84.20
75.10
92.00
80.80
73.10
99.80
90.00
83.10
72.40
78.80
87.30
91.00
80.10
73.60
86.40
74.50
71.20
92.40
81.50
85.30
69.90
84.20
90.70
100.30




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time5 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 5 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20932&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]5 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20932&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20932&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time5 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135







Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap
statisticQ1EstimateQ3S.D.IQR
mean85.74139344262386.893442622950888.13196721311481.684956742778382.39057377049181
median86.487.3881.892220123026911.59999999999999
midrange88.188.188.851.042415738149750.75

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap \tabularnewline
statistic & Q1 & Estimate & Q3 & S.D. & IQR \tabularnewline
mean & 85.741393442623 & 86.8934426229508 & 88.1319672131148 & 1.68495674277838 & 2.39057377049181 \tabularnewline
median & 86.4 & 87.3 & 88 & 1.89222012302691 & 1.59999999999999 \tabularnewline
midrange & 88.1 & 88.1 & 88.85 & 1.04241573814975 & 0.75 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20932&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]statistic[/C][C]Q1[/C][C]Estimate[/C][C]Q3[/C][C]S.D.[/C][C]IQR[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]mean[/C][C]85.741393442623[/C][C]86.8934426229508[/C][C]88.1319672131148[/C][C]1.68495674277838[/C][C]2.39057377049181[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]median[/C][C]86.4[/C][C]87.3[/C][C]88[/C][C]1.89222012302691[/C][C]1.59999999999999[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]midrange[/C][C]88.1[/C][C]88.1[/C][C]88.85[/C][C]1.04241573814975[/C][C]0.75[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20932&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=20932&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap
statisticQ1EstimateQ3S.D.IQR
mean85.74139344262386.893442622950888.13196721311481.684956742778382.39057377049181
median86.487.3881.892220123026911.59999999999999
midrange88.188.188.851.042415738149750.75



Parameters (Session):
par1 = 500 ; par2 = 12 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 500 ; par2 = 12 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
par2 <- as.numeric(par2)
if (par1 < 10) par1 = 10
if (par1 > 5000) par1 = 5000
if (par2 < 3) par2 = 3
if (par2 > length(x)) par2 = length(x)
library(lattice)
library(boot)
boot.stat <- function(s)
{
s.mean <- mean(s)
s.median <- median(s)
s.midrange <- (max(s) + min(s)) / 2
c(s.mean, s.median, s.midrange)
}
(r <- tsboot(x, boot.stat, R=par1, l=12, sim='fixed'))
bitmap(file='plot1.png')
plot(r$t[,1],type='p',ylab='simulated values',main='Simulation of Mean')
grid()
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot2.png')
plot(r$t[,2],type='p',ylab='simulated values',main='Simulation of Median')
grid()
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot3.png')
plot(r$t[,3],type='p',ylab='simulated values',main='Simulation of Midrange')
grid()
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot4.png')
densityplot(~r$t[,1],col='black',main='Density Plot',xlab='mean')
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot5.png')
densityplot(~r$t[,2],col='black',main='Density Plot',xlab='median')
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot6.png')
densityplot(~r$t[,3],col='black',main='Density Plot',xlab='midrange')
dev.off()
z <- data.frame(cbind(r$t[,1],r$t[,2],r$t[,3]))
colnames(z) <- list('mean','median','midrange')
bitmap(file='plot7.png')
boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,ylab='simulated values',main='Bootstrap Simulation - Central Tendency')
grid()
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap',6,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'statistic',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Q1',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Estimate',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Q3',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'S.D.',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'IQR',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'mean',header=TRUE)
q1 <- quantile(r$t[,1],0.25)[[1]]
q3 <- quantile(r$t[,1],0.75)[[1]]
a<-table.element(a,q1)
a<-table.element(a,r$t0[1])
a<-table.element(a,q3)
a<-table.element(a,sqrt(var(r$t[,1])))
a<-table.element(a,q3-q1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'median',header=TRUE)
q1 <- quantile(r$t[,2],0.25)[[1]]
q3 <- quantile(r$t[,2],0.75)[[1]]
a<-table.element(a,q1)
a<-table.element(a,r$t0[2])
a<-table.element(a,q3)
a<-table.element(a,sqrt(var(r$t[,2])))
a<-table.element(a,q3-q1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'midrange',header=TRUE)
q1 <- quantile(r$t[,3],0.25)[[1]]
q3 <- quantile(r$t[,3],0.75)[[1]]
a<-table.element(a,q1)
a<-table.element(a,r$t0[3])
a<-table.element(a,q3)
a<-table.element(a,sqrt(var(r$t[,3])))
a<-table.element(a,q3-q1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')