FreeStatistics.org

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Description of Statistical Computation

Author's title

Author*The author of this computation has been verified*
R Software Modulerwasp_bootstrapplot.wasp
Title produced by softwareBlocked Bootstrap Plot - Central Tendency
Date of computationTue, 04 Nov 2008 04:16:07 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Nov/04/t1225798300dc056r1wx36nqx1.htm/, Retrieved Mon, 20 May 2024 12:13:50 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21490, Retrieved Mon, 20 May 2024 12:13:50 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact147

Tree of Dependent Computations

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [Blocked Bootstrap Plot - Central Tendency] [Bootstrap question 4] [2008-11-04 11:16:07] [51c0bf2e8d2e36d7824d95d26ff0a48d] [Current]
Feedback Forum
2008-11-12 09:51:13 [94a54c888ac7f7d6874c3108eb0e1808] [reply] 
De conclusie van de student is juist met een correcte berekening.De midrange geeft in dit geval de beste oplossing omdat die een heel kleine spreding weergeeft. Toch zitten er een heleboel outliers bij, maar zijn hier niet belangrijk. In andere gevallen moeten. Hier heeft het gemiddelde bijvoorbeeld een grotere spreiding dan de midrange, maar veel minder outliers. Dit geeft veel zekerheid maar in geval van outliers gaat het wel extreem fout. Al bij al is voor deze opgave de midrange de beste benadering voor de geschatte waarde van productie van kledij.
2008-11-12 11:24:09 [Bénédicte Soens] [reply] 
Bij Q4 ga ik niet zo akkoord. Het is volgens mij het gemiddelde die alles het beste weergeeft. Er zijn minder outliers bij het gemiddelde. De student zegt dat de mid Range is het beste is, maar daarbij ga ik niet akkoord. Bij een volledig normale situatie is mid Range het beste maar als het 1 maal slecht zou gaan dan gaat het bij de mid range toch wel heel slecht. Dus ik zou het gemiddelde gebruiken als beste manier. Dit is dan ook weer te zien in de density plot want voor het gemiddelde lijkt dit het beste op een normale verdeling, terwijl er voor de mediaan of de mid Range veel pieken zijn.

Post a new message

Dataset

Dataseries X:
Download CSV
Histogram
Boxplots 
109.20
88.60
94.30
98.30
86.40
80.60
104.10
108.20
93.40
71.90
94.10
94.90
96.40
91.10
84.40
86.40
88.00
75.10
109.70
103.00
82.10
68.00
96.40
94.30
90.00
88.00
76.10
82.50
81.40
66.50
97.20
94.10
80.70
70.50
87.80
89.50
99.60
84.20
75.10
92.00
80.80
73.10
99.80
90.00
83.10
72.40
78.80
87.30
91.00
80.10
73.60
86.40
74.50
71.20
92.40
81.50
85.30
69.90
84.20
90.70
100.30

Tables (Output of Computation)





Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time4 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 4 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21490&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]4 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21490&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21490&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time4 seconds
R Server'Gwilym Jenkins' @ 72.249.127.135






Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap
statisticQ1EstimateQ3S.D.IQR
mean85.565163934426286.893442622950887.8251.625124873133972.25983606557377
median86.487.3881.868353641755581.59999999999999
midrange87.8588.188.851.018840552856181

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap \tabularnewline
statistic & Q1 & Estimate & Q3 & S.D. & IQR \tabularnewline
mean & 85.5651639344262 & 86.8934426229508 & 87.825 & 1.62512487313397 & 2.25983606557377 \tabularnewline
median & 86.4 & 87.3 & 88 & 1.86835364175558 & 1.59999999999999 \tabularnewline
midrange & 87.85 & 88.1 & 88.85 & 1.01884055285618 & 1 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21490&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]statistic[/C][C]Q1[/C][C]Estimate[/C][C]Q3[/C][C]S.D.[/C][C]IQR[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]mean[/C][C]85.5651639344262[/C][C]86.8934426229508[/C][C]87.825[/C][C]1.62512487313397[/C][C]2.25983606557377[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]median[/C][C]86.4[/C][C]87.3[/C][C]88[/C][C]1.86835364175558[/C][C]1.59999999999999[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]midrange[/C][C]87.85[/C][C]88.1[/C][C]88.85[/C][C]1.01884055285618[/C][C]1[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21490&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=21490&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  
QR Code


The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap
statisticQ1EstimateQ3S.D.IQR
mean85.565163934426286.893442622950887.8251.625124873133972.25983606557377
median86.487.3881.868353641755581.59999999999999
midrange87.8588.188.851.018840552856181


Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code

Parameters (Session):
par1 = 500 ; par2 = 12 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = 500 ; par2 = 12 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
par2 <- as.numeric(par2)
if (par1 < 10) par1 = 10
if (par1 > 5000) par1 = 5000
if (par2 < 3) par2 = 3
if (par2 > length(x)) par2 = length(x)
library(lattice)
library(boot)
boot.stat <- function(s)
{
s.mean <- mean(s)
s.median <- median(s)
s.midrange <- (max(s) + min(s)) / 2
c(s.mean, s.median, s.midrange)
}
(r <- tsboot(x, boot.stat, R=par1, l=12, sim='fixed'))
bitmap(file='plot1.png')
plot(r$t[,1],type='p',ylab='simulated values',main='Simulation of Mean')
grid()
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot2.png')
plot(r$t[,2],type='p',ylab='simulated values',main='Simulation of Median')
grid()
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot3.png')
plot(r$t[,3],type='p',ylab='simulated values',main='Simulation of Midrange')
grid()
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot4.png')
densityplot(~r$t[,1],col='black',main='Density Plot',xlab='mean')
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot5.png')
densityplot(~r$t[,2],col='black',main='Density Plot',xlab='median')
dev.off()
bitmap(file='plot6.png')
densityplot(~r$t[,3],col='black',main='Density Plot',xlab='midrange')
dev.off()
z <- data.frame(cbind(r$t[,1],r$t[,2],r$t[,3]))
colnames(z) <- list('mean','median','midrange')
bitmap(file='plot7.png')
boxplot(z,notch=TRUE,ylab='simulated values',main='Bootstrap Simulation - Central Tendency')
grid()
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Estimation Results of Blocked Bootstrap',6,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'statistic',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Q1',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Estimate',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Q3',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'S.D.',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'IQR',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'mean',header=TRUE)
q1 <- quantile(r$t[,1],0.25)[[1]]
q3 <- quantile(r$t[,1],0.75)[[1]]
a<-table.element(a,q1)
a<-table.element(a,r$t0[1])
a<-table.element(a,q3)
a<-table.element(a,sqrt(var(r$t[,1])))
a<-table.element(a,q3-q1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'median',header=TRUE)
q1 <- quantile(r$t[,2],0.25)[[1]]
q3 <- quantile(r$t[,2],0.75)[[1]]
a<-table.element(a,q1)
a<-table.element(a,r$t0[2])
a<-table.element(a,q3)
a<-table.element(a,sqrt(var(r$t[,2])))
a<-table.element(a,q3-q1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'midrange',header=TRUE)
q1 <- quantile(r$t[,3],0.25)[[1]]
q3 <- quantile(r$t[,3],0.75)[[1]]
a<-table.element(a,q1)
a<-table.element(a,r$t0[3])
a<-table.element(a,q3)
a<-table.element(a,sqrt(var(r$t[,3])))
a<-table.element(a,q3-q1)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')