Repository of Reproducible Computations

Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author

*The author of this computation has been verified*

R Software Module

rwasp_smp.wasp

Title produced by software

Standard Deviation-Mean Plot

Date of computation

Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:05:20 -0700

Cite this page as follows

Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Dec/05/t1228482456byr3jhuuer9kdcq.htm/, Retrieved Thu, 16 May 2024 07:24:11 +0000

Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228, Retrieved Thu, 16 May 2024 07:24:11 +0000

QR Codes:

Paste this QR Code to cite your computation.

Original text written by user:

Taak 8

IsPrivate?

No (this computation is public)

User-defined keywords

Taak 8

Estimated Impact

203

Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)

-     [Univariate Data Series] [data set] [2008-12-01 19:54:57] [b98453cac15ba1066b407e146608df68]
F RMP     [Standard Deviation-Mean Plot] [SMP total unemplo...] [2008-12-05 13:05:20] [9b05d7ef5dbcfba4217d280d9092f628] [Current]
-   P       [Standard Deviation-Mean Plot] [1] [2008-12-08 20:09:23] [988ab43f527fc78aae41c84649095267] 

Feedback Forum

2008-12-12 14:25:15 [9142cf052ad32d043faa9486189092cf] [reply] 
Als we gaan kijken naar de eerste tabel zien we dat de p-waarde = 0,003.  
Deze P-waarde heeft betrekking op de beta coëfficiënt (= de helling van de scatterplot) van de scatter plot. We zien dat deze beta coëfficiënt significant verschillend is van 0.  Zoals de student vermeld heeft in zijn conclusie. We kunnen dus concluderen dat er een niet toevallig verband bestaat tussen het gemiddelde en de standaardfout.  
We gaan dus verder werken met de lambda uit de volgende tabel. 
2008-12-14 12:22:35 [Matthieu Blondeau] [reply] 
De SMP deelt de ingegeven data in sections(= elke bolleke is gelijk aan 1 jaar).   
 
Als we een lijn zouden trekken door ale de bollekes krijgen we een positief stijgende lijn. Als de werkloosheid stijgt, zal de standaard fout dus ook stijgen. 
 
De p-waarde bedraagt inderdaad 0,38%, waardoor dat de kans dat het resultaat er door toeval komt heel klein is. De Beta is positief, er is dus een stijgende lijn in de grafiek. De Lambda bedraagt 0,47 ~ 0,5.
2008-12-15 22:51:33 [Thomas Baken] [reply] 
De student heeft de vraag correct beantwoord. Om een juiste oplossing te vinden bij deze stap is het belangrijk om een blik te werpen op de Lambdawaarde. Deze mag enkel onder de loep worden genomen indien het scatterplot vrij is van sterke uitschieters die de rechte in het plot zouden kunnen beïnvloeden. In dit geval is dit niet zo, er is een uitschieter te bemerken maar deze zal geen invloed hebben op de rechte. Bovendien is het belangrijk om te weten dat beta niet gelijk mag zijn aan 0. Tenslotte is het ook belangrijk om te kijken naar de P-waarde of we hier te maken hebben met toeval, in dit geval kunnen we besluiten dat de P-waarde significant verschillende is van 0 en dus is er geen toeval. Indien de tijdreeks aan al deze vereisten voldaan heeft zullen we eens kijken of we ze stationair kunnen maken in stap 2.
2008-12-15 23:18:06 [Inge Meelberghs] [reply] 
Uit de eerste tabel kunnen we de beta waarde en de p-waarde aflezen. De p-waarde heeft betrekking op de beta waarde van de regressie rechte. Hier wordt de beta dus eigenlijk getoetst. Aan de hand van deze waarde kunnen we ook nagaan of de helling positief of negatief is en of deze te wijten is aan toeval ?  
In dit geval bedraagt β 0.0488516650103526 wat wil zeggen de rechte dus  een stijgend verloop aanneemt. De P-waarde is zeer klein, 0.00382792717820021. Deze is dus < dan 5% wat ervoor zorgt dat de beta waarde significant van 0 is. (dit is de eerste  voorwaarde waaraan voldaan moet zijn) 
 
In de 2e tabel zien we dat de  lambdawaarde 0,467… bedraagt. Afgerond wordt dit 0,5. We hebben dus al een deeltje van de vergelijking gevonden namelijk  Yt 0,5. 
 
Als outliers in de scatterplot meer naar links of rechts wijken moeten we opletten doordat deze dan  een invloed hebben op het verloop van de regressierechte. In deze berekening is dit echter niet het geval. In de grafiek kan je duidelijk zien dat de outlier meer in het midden van de scatterplot ligt waardoor ze dus geen invloed heeft. (dit is de tweede voorwaarde waaraan voldaan moet zijn. 
 
Conclusie 
Doordat aan de twee voorwaarden is voldaan mogen we 0,5 als lambda waarde aannemen. 

Post a new message

Dataseries X:

Download CSV

Histogram

Boxplots

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Input	view raw input (R code)
Raw Output	view raw output of R engine
Computing time	2 seconds
R Server	'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 2 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]2 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Input	view raw input (R code)
Raw Output	view raw output of R engine
Computing time	2 seconds
R Server	'Herman Ole Andreas Wold' @ 193.190.124.10:1001

Standard Deviation-Mean Plot
Section	Mean	Standard Deviation	Range
1	227.733333333333	29.1940010442162	106
2	363.65	36.3267119348834	139.3
3	328.916666666667	93.5458451857438	273.6
4	205.45	30.3247123946491	89.5
5	188.333333333333	27.3773739803621	86
6	181.25	26.1571995999016	85.2
7	353.341666666667	36.2089506346236	110.8
8	285.308333333333	46.6051783766048	138.5
9	275.125	35.0509272345255	108.8
10	285.85	30.7409262296136	86.7
11	460.166666666667	56.0969831198748	147.3
12	373.95	53.1021228817215	150.3
13	385.1	35.1442999387072	115.5
14	471.358333333333	64.2130184808676	179.1
15	394.208333333333	40.6847628018454	138.7
16	407	46.6030432092544	147.6
17	378.575	49.9696839912143	132
18	336.633333333333	51.5290973993129	146.3
19	287.841666666667	33.2699826033054	112.7
20	297.566666666667	30.476438987082	117
21	281.666666666667	40.7140434412173	131.1
22	283.033333333333	28.4860837901065	109
23	408.85	48.934882520271	128.5
24	499.333333333333	37.5159925494408	109.6
25	484.008333333333	48.4390236808249	133.1
26	430.433333333333	37.4665022103584	108.4
27	507.583333333333	53.8722703730919	196.2
28	782.975	48.4555489832973	137.4
29	728.8	53.3077684940777	187
30	685.558333333333	72.5442618285032	222.9
31	604.716666666667	50.4040372360882	144

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Standard Deviation-Mean Plot \tabularnewline
Section & Mean & Standard Deviation & Range \tabularnewline
1 & 227.733333333333 & 29.1940010442162 & 106 \tabularnewline
2 & 363.65 & 36.3267119348834 & 139.3 \tabularnewline
3 & 328.916666666667 & 93.5458451857438 & 273.6 \tabularnewline
4 & 205.45 & 30.3247123946491 & 89.5 \tabularnewline
5 & 188.333333333333 & 27.3773739803621 & 86 \tabularnewline
6 & 181.25 & 26.1571995999016 & 85.2 \tabularnewline
7 & 353.341666666667 & 36.2089506346236 & 110.8 \tabularnewline
8 & 285.308333333333 & 46.6051783766048 & 138.5 \tabularnewline
9 & 275.125 & 35.0509272345255 & 108.8 \tabularnewline
10 & 285.85 & 30.7409262296136 & 86.7 \tabularnewline
11 & 460.166666666667 & 56.0969831198748 & 147.3 \tabularnewline
12 & 373.95 & 53.1021228817215 & 150.3 \tabularnewline
13 & 385.1 & 35.1442999387072 & 115.5 \tabularnewline
14 & 471.358333333333 & 64.2130184808676 & 179.1 \tabularnewline
15 & 394.208333333333 & 40.6847628018454 & 138.7 \tabularnewline
16 & 407 & 46.6030432092544 & 147.6 \tabularnewline
17 & 378.575 & 49.9696839912143 & 132 \tabularnewline
18 & 336.633333333333 & 51.5290973993129 & 146.3 \tabularnewline
19 & 287.841666666667 & 33.2699826033054 & 112.7 \tabularnewline
20 & 297.566666666667 & 30.476438987082 & 117 \tabularnewline
21 & 281.666666666667 & 40.7140434412173 & 131.1 \tabularnewline
22 & 283.033333333333 & 28.4860837901065 & 109 \tabularnewline
23 & 408.85 & 48.934882520271 & 128.5 \tabularnewline
24 & 499.333333333333 & 37.5159925494408 & 109.6 \tabularnewline
25 & 484.008333333333 & 48.4390236808249 & 133.1 \tabularnewline
26 & 430.433333333333 & 37.4665022103584 & 108.4 \tabularnewline
27 & 507.583333333333 & 53.8722703730919 & 196.2 \tabularnewline
28 & 782.975 & 48.4555489832973 & 137.4 \tabularnewline
29 & 728.8 & 53.3077684940777 & 187 \tabularnewline
30 & 685.558333333333 & 72.5442618285032 & 222.9 \tabularnewline
31 & 604.716666666667 & 50.4040372360882 & 144 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Standard Deviation-Mean Plot[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Section[/C][C]Mean[/C][C]Standard Deviation[/C][C]Range[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]1[/C][C]227.733333333333[/C][C]29.1940010442162[/C][C]106[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]2[/C][C]363.65[/C][C]36.3267119348834[/C][C]139.3[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]3[/C][C]328.916666666667[/C][C]93.5458451857438[/C][C]273.6[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]4[/C][C]205.45[/C][C]30.3247123946491[/C][C]89.5[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]5[/C][C]188.333333333333[/C][C]27.3773739803621[/C][C]86[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]6[/C][C]181.25[/C][C]26.1571995999016[/C][C]85.2[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]7[/C][C]353.341666666667[/C][C]36.2089506346236[/C][C]110.8[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]8[/C][C]285.308333333333[/C][C]46.6051783766048[/C][C]138.5[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]9[/C][C]275.125[/C][C]35.0509272345255[/C][C]108.8[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]10[/C][C]285.85[/C][C]30.7409262296136[/C][C]86.7[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]11[/C][C]460.166666666667[/C][C]56.0969831198748[/C][C]147.3[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]12[/C][C]373.95[/C][C]53.1021228817215[/C][C]150.3[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]13[/C][C]385.1[/C][C]35.1442999387072[/C][C]115.5[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]14[/C][C]471.358333333333[/C][C]64.2130184808676[/C][C]179.1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]15[/C][C]394.208333333333[/C][C]40.6847628018454[/C][C]138.7[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]16[/C][C]407[/C][C]46.6030432092544[/C][C]147.6[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]17[/C][C]378.575[/C][C]49.9696839912143[/C][C]132[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]18[/C][C]336.633333333333[/C][C]51.5290973993129[/C][C]146.3[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]19[/C][C]287.841666666667[/C][C]33.2699826033054[/C][C]112.7[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]20[/C][C]297.566666666667[/C][C]30.476438987082[/C][C]117[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]21[/C][C]281.666666666667[/C][C]40.7140434412173[/C][C]131.1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]22[/C][C]283.033333333333[/C][C]28.4860837901065[/C][C]109[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]23[/C][C]408.85[/C][C]48.934882520271[/C][C]128.5[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]24[/C][C]499.333333333333[/C][C]37.5159925494408[/C][C]109.6[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]25[/C][C]484.008333333333[/C][C]48.4390236808249[/C][C]133.1[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]26[/C][C]430.433333333333[/C][C]37.4665022103584[/C][C]108.4[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]27[/C][C]507.583333333333[/C][C]53.8722703730919[/C][C]196.2[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]28[/C][C]782.975[/C][C]48.4555489832973[/C][C]137.4[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]29[/C][C]728.8[/C][C]53.3077684940777[/C][C]187[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]30[/C][C]685.558333333333[/C][C]72.5442618285032[/C][C]222.9[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]31[/C][C]604.716666666667[/C][C]50.4040372360882[/C][C]144[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Standard Deviation-Mean Plot
Section	Mean	Standard Deviation	Range
1	227.733333333333	29.1940010442162	106
2	363.65	36.3267119348834	139.3
3	328.916666666667	93.5458451857438	273.6
4	205.45	30.3247123946491	89.5
5	188.333333333333	27.3773739803621	86
6	181.25	26.1571995999016	85.2
7	353.341666666667	36.2089506346236	110.8
8	285.308333333333	46.6051783766048	138.5
9	275.125	35.0509272345255	108.8
10	285.85	30.7409262296136	86.7
11	460.166666666667	56.0969831198748	147.3
12	373.95	53.1021228817215	150.3
13	385.1	35.1442999387072	115.5
14	471.358333333333	64.2130184808676	179.1
15	394.208333333333	40.6847628018454	138.7
16	407	46.6030432092544	147.6
17	378.575	49.9696839912143	132
18	336.633333333333	51.5290973993129	146.3
19	287.841666666667	33.2699826033054	112.7
20	297.566666666667	30.476438987082	117
21	281.666666666667	40.7140434412173	131.1
22	283.033333333333	28.4860837901065	109
23	408.85	48.934882520271	128.5
24	499.333333333333	37.5159925494408	109.6
25	484.008333333333	48.4390236808249	133.1
26	430.433333333333	37.4665022103584	108.4
27	507.583333333333	53.8722703730919	196.2
28	782.975	48.4555489832973	137.4
29	728.8	53.3077684940777	187
30	685.558333333333	72.5442618285032	222.9
31	604.716666666667	50.4040372360882	144

Regression: S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * Mean(k)
alpha	25.0818554501784
beta	0.0488516650103526
S.D.	0.0155384837695400
T-STAT	3.14391453728042
p-value	0.00382792717820019

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Regression: S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * Mean(k) \tabularnewline
alpha & 25.0818554501784 \tabularnewline
beta & 0.0488516650103526 \tabularnewline
S.D. & 0.0155384837695400 \tabularnewline
T-STAT & 3.14391453728042 \tabularnewline
p-value & 0.00382792717820019 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=2

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Regression: S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * Mean(k)[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]alpha[/C][C]25.0818554501784[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]beta[/C][C]0.0488516650103526[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]S.D.[/C][C]0.0155384837695400[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]T-STAT[/C][C]3.14391453728042[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]p-value[/C][C]0.00382792717820019[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=2

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=2

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Regression: S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * Mean(k)
alpha	25.0818554501784
beta	0.0488516650103526
S.D.	0.0155384837695400
T-STAT	3.14391453728042
p-value	0.00382792717820019

Regression: ln S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * ln Mean(k)
alpha	0.596066412617832
beta	0.532942026074987
S.D.	0.115396834084912
T-STAT	4.61834183148243
p-value	7.31833172336402e-05
Lambda	0.467057973925013

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Regression: ln S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * ln Mean(k) \tabularnewline
alpha & 0.596066412617832 \tabularnewline
beta & 0.532942026074987 \tabularnewline
S.D. & 0.115396834084912 \tabularnewline
T-STAT & 4.61834183148243 \tabularnewline
p-value & 7.31833172336402e-05 \tabularnewline
Lambda & 0.467057973925013 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=3

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Regression: ln S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * ln Mean(k)[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]alpha[/C][C]0.596066412617832[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]beta[/C][C]0.532942026074987[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]S.D.[/C][C]0.115396834084912[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]T-STAT[/C][C]4.61834183148243[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]p-value[/C][C]7.31833172336402e-05[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Lambda[/C][C]0.467057973925013[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=3

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=29228&T=3

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Regression: ln S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * ln Mean(k)
alpha	0.596066412617832
beta	0.532942026074987
S.D.	0.115396834084912
T-STAT	4.61834183148243
p-value	7.31833172336402e-05
Lambda	0.467057973925013

Figure 1

PNG link

Postscript link

PDF link

Figure 2

PNG link

Postscript link

PDF link

Parameters (Session):

par1 = Unemployment between 25 and -50 ; par2 = http://www.nbb.be/belgostat/PresentationLinker?TableId=217000022&Lang=N ; par3 = Unemployment between 25 and -50 ;

Parameters (R input):

par1 = 12 ;

R code (references can be found in the software module):

par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
(n <- length(x))
(np <- floor(n / par1))
arr <- array(NA,dim=c(par1,np))
j <- 0
k <- 1
for (i in 1:(np*par1))
{
j = j + 1
arr[j,k] <- x[i]
if (j == par1) {
j = 0
k=k+1
}
}
arr
arr.mean <- array(NA,dim=np)
arr.sd <- array(NA,dim=np)
arr.range <- array(NA,dim=np)
for (j in 1:np)
{
arr.mean[j] <- mean(arr[,j],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.sd[j] <- sd(arr[,j],na.rm=TRUE)
arr.range[j] <- max(arr[,j],na.rm=TRUE) - min(arr[,j],na.rm=TRUE)
}
arr.mean
arr.sd
arr.range
(lm1 <- lm(arr.sd~arr.mean))
(lnlm1 <- lm(log(arr.sd)~log(arr.mean)))
(lm2 <- lm(arr.range~arr.mean))
bitmap(file='test1.png')
plot(arr.mean,arr.sd,main='Standard Deviation-Mean Plot',xlab='mean',ylab='standard deviation')
dev.off()
bitmap(file='test2.png')
plot(arr.mean,arr.range,main='Range-Mean Plot',xlab='mean',ylab='range')
dev.off()
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Standard Deviation-Mean Plot',4,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Section',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Mean',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Standard Deviation',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'Range',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
for (j in 1:np) {
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,j,header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,arr.mean[j])
a<-table.element(a,arr.sd[j] )
a<-table.element(a,arr.range[j] )
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Regression: S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * Mean(k)',2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'alpha',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,lm1$coefficients[[1]])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'beta',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,lm1$coefficients[[2]])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'S.D.',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,summary(lm1)$coefficients[2,2])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'T-STAT',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,summary(lm1)$coefficients[2,3])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,summary(lm1)$coefficients[2,4])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable1.tab')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Regression: ln S.E.(k) = alpha + beta * ln Mean(k)',2,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'alpha',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,lnlm1$coefficients[[1]])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'beta',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,lnlm1$coefficients[[2]])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'S.D.',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,summary(lnlm1)$coefficients[2,2])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'T-STAT',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,summary(lnlm1)$coefficients[2,3])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'p-value',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,summary(lnlm1)$coefficients[2,4])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Lambda',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,1-lnlm1$coefficients[[2]])
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable2.tab')

Free Statistics

Description of Statistical Computation

Tree of Dependent Computations

Dataset

Tables (Output of Computation)

Figures (Output of Computation)

Input Parameters & R Code