Free Statistics

of Irreproducible Research!

Author's title

Author*Unverified author*
R Software Modulerwasp_autocorrelation.wasp
Title produced by software(Partial) Autocorrelation Function
Date of computationWed, 03 Dec 2008 02:16:10 -0700
Cite this page as followsStatistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Dec/03/t1228296011duo5m9fub5446jh.htm/, Retrieved Fri, 17 May 2024 18:34:35 +0000
Statistical Computations at FreeStatistics.org, Office for Research Development and Education, URL https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586, Retrieved Fri, 17 May 2024 18:34:35 +0000
QR Codes:

Original text written by user:
IsPrivate?No (this computation is public)
User-defined keywords
Estimated Impact279
Family? (F = Feedback message, R = changed R code, M = changed R Module, P = changed Parameters, D = changed Data)
F       [(Partial) Autocorrelation Function] [] [2008-12-03 09:16:10] [ed75e673b8609ce7f7795f94157397be] [Current]
-   P     [(Partial) Autocorrelation Function] [Q6 ACF d=1 D=0] [2008-12-07 18:59:29] [b1bd16d1f47bfe13feacf1c27a0abba5]
Feedback Forum
2008-12-06 12:52:39 [Nicolaj Wuyts] [reply
De student voert de berekening correct uit. Hij is echter een ding vergeten en dat is van de lamba gelijk te stellen aan -0.312592539725757. Door deze bewerking wordt de spreiding doorheen de tijd terug gelijk, wat nu niet het geval is.
2008-12-07 19:02:29 [Jasmine Hendrikx] [reply
Evaluatie Q6:
De berekening is goed gemaakt. Uit de grafiek van de autocorrelatie is er duidelijk sprake van een langzaam dalend patroon. We kunnen dus spreken van positieve autocorrelaties. Alle autocorrelatiecoëfficiënten zijn ook significant verschillend van 0, aangezien ze allemaal buiten het 95% betrouwbaarheidsinterval vallen.
Er is dus een trendmatig verloop in onze tijdreeks. De student vermeldt ook dat er seizoenaliteit aanwezig door het hangmattenpatroon. Dit is inderdaad correct, maar dit hangmattenpatroon komt beter tot uiting wanneer men in de berekening number of time lags gelijkstelt aan 36 of 60.Dan kunnen we zien dat er in de periode 12,24,36 er telkens een stijging is, en dit wijst dan op seizoenaliteit. In de seizoenale coëfficiënten kunnen we ook een langzaam dalend patroon waarnemen. De student heeft in de volgende stap ineens D en d gelijkgestelt aan 1, maar eigenlijk zou het beter zijn, als je stapsgewijs werkt. Zo kun je de evolutie beter zien. Zo kun je beter eerst d gelijkstellen aan 1 en D nog 0 laten. Hieronder de URL: http://www.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?v=date/2008/Dec/07/t1228676414blachrnxmt1ri9d.htm
We zien dan dat de grafiek er helemaal anders uitziet. De lange termijn trend is nu volledig verdwenen. We zien dus dat differentiëren helpt om de langetermijntrend weg te werken.
Wel zien we dat er nog een langzaam dalend patroon is in de seizoenale autocorrelatiecoëfficiënten (op lag 12, 24, 36). Wanneer we 60 periodes teruggaan, kunnen we enkel deze langzame daling bevestigen. Vandaar dat we D nu moeten gelijkstellen aan 1. In het document is ook de grafiek van partiële autocorrelatie gekopieerd. Dit is echter niet nodig, aangezien we deze niet gebruiken.
2008-12-08 19:30:20 [Erik Geysen] [reply
We zien een positive correlatie, de figuur gaat langzaam dalend met bulten. We kunnen dus besluiten dat in deze tijdreeks een lange termijn trend zit. We stellen ook seizoenaliteit vast. (hangmatpatroon)
De trend wordt verwijderd door d gelijk te stellen aan 1.
we stellen nog steeds seizoenaliteit vast.
Deze wordt ook weg gewerkt door D gelijk te stellen aan 1.

Post a new message
Dataseries X:
112
118
132
129
121
135
148
148
136
119
104
118
115
126
141
135
125
149
170
170
158
133
114
140
145
150
178
163
172
178
199
199
184
162
146
166
171
180
193
181
183
218
230
242
209
191
172
194
196
196
236
235
229
243
264
272
237
211
180
201
204
188
235
227
234
264
302
293
259
229
203
229
242
233
267
269
270
315
364
347
312
274
237
278
284
277
317
313
318
374
413
405
355
306
271
306
315
301
356
348
355
422
465
467
404
347
305
336
340
318
362
348
363
435
491
505
404
359
310
337
360
342
406
396
420
472
548
559
463
407
362
405
417
391
419
461
472
535
622
606
508
461
390
432




Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Summary of computational transaction \tabularnewline
Raw Input & view raw input (R code)  \tabularnewline
Raw Output & view raw output of R engine  \tabularnewline
Computing time & 1 seconds \tabularnewline
R Server & 'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=0

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Summary of computational transaction[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Input[/C][C]view raw input (R code) [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Raw Output[/C][C]view raw output of R engine [/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Computing time[/C][C]1 seconds[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]R Server[/C][C]'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=0

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=0

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Summary of computational transaction
Raw Inputview raw input (R code)
Raw Outputview raw output of R engine
Computing time1 seconds
R Server'George Udny Yule' @ 72.249.76.132







Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
20.87557510.50690
30.8066819.68020
40.7526259.03150
50.713778.56520
60.6817348.18080
70.6629047.95490
80.655617.86730
90.6709488.05140
100.702728.43260
110.743248.91890
120.7603959.12470
130.7126618.55190
140.6463427.75610
150.5859237.03110
160.5379556.45550
170.4997485.9970
180.4687345.62480
190.4498715.39840
200.4416295.29950
210.4572245.48670

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Autocorrelation Function \tabularnewline
Time lag k & ACF(k) & T-STAT & P-value \tabularnewline
1 & 0.948047 & 11.3766 & 0 \tabularnewline
2 & 0.875575 & 10.5069 & 0 \tabularnewline
3 & 0.806681 & 9.6802 & 0 \tabularnewline
4 & 0.752625 & 9.0315 & 0 \tabularnewline
5 & 0.71377 & 8.5652 & 0 \tabularnewline
6 & 0.681734 & 8.1808 & 0 \tabularnewline
7 & 0.662904 & 7.9549 & 0 \tabularnewline
8 & 0.65561 & 7.8673 & 0 \tabularnewline
9 & 0.670948 & 8.0514 & 0 \tabularnewline
10 & 0.70272 & 8.4326 & 0 \tabularnewline
11 & 0.74324 & 8.9189 & 0 \tabularnewline
12 & 0.760395 & 9.1247 & 0 \tabularnewline
13 & 0.712661 & 8.5519 & 0 \tabularnewline
14 & 0.646342 & 7.7561 & 0 \tabularnewline
15 & 0.585923 & 7.0311 & 0 \tabularnewline
16 & 0.537955 & 6.4555 & 0 \tabularnewline
17 & 0.499748 & 5.997 & 0 \tabularnewline
18 & 0.468734 & 5.6248 & 0 \tabularnewline
19 & 0.449871 & 5.3984 & 0 \tabularnewline
20 & 0.441629 & 5.2995 & 0 \tabularnewline
21 & 0.457224 & 5.4867 & 0 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=1

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Autocorrelation Function[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Time lag k[/C][C]ACF(k)[/C][C]T-STAT[/C][C]P-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]1[/C][C]0.948047[/C][C]11.3766[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]2[/C][C]0.875575[/C][C]10.5069[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]3[/C][C]0.806681[/C][C]9.6802[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]4[/C][C]0.752625[/C][C]9.0315[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]5[/C][C]0.71377[/C][C]8.5652[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]6[/C][C]0.681734[/C][C]8.1808[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]7[/C][C]0.662904[/C][C]7.9549[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]8[/C][C]0.65561[/C][C]7.8673[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]9[/C][C]0.670948[/C][C]8.0514[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]10[/C][C]0.70272[/C][C]8.4326[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]11[/C][C]0.74324[/C][C]8.9189[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]12[/C][C]0.760395[/C][C]9.1247[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]13[/C][C]0.712661[/C][C]8.5519[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]14[/C][C]0.646342[/C][C]7.7561[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]15[/C][C]0.585923[/C][C]7.0311[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]16[/C][C]0.537955[/C][C]6.4555[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]17[/C][C]0.499748[/C][C]5.997[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]18[/C][C]0.468734[/C][C]5.6248[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]19[/C][C]0.449871[/C][C]5.3984[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]20[/C][C]0.441629[/C][C]5.2995[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]21[/C][C]0.457224[/C][C]5.4867[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=1

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=1

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
20.87557510.50690
30.8066819.68020
40.7526259.03150
50.713778.56520
60.6817348.18080
70.6629047.95490
80.655617.86730
90.6709488.05140
100.702728.43260
110.743248.91890
120.7603959.12470
130.7126618.55190
140.6463427.75610
150.5859237.03110
160.5379556.45550
170.4997485.9970
180.4687345.62480
190.4498715.39840
200.4416295.29950
210.4572245.48670







Partial Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kPACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
2-0.229422-2.75310.003332
30.0381480.45780.323903
40.0937851.12540.131141
50.0736070.88330.189279
60.0077280.09270.463123
70.1255971.50720.066979
80.0899511.07940.141103
90.2324892.78990.002994
100.1660511.99260.024097
110.1712742.05530.020829
12-0.135431-1.62520.053156
13-0.539691-6.47630
14-0.02661-0.31930.374973
150.0907651.08920.138947
160.0249560.29950.382508
170.0325160.39020.348487
180.0734330.88120.189841
190.0484420.58130.280972
20-0.045542-0.54650.292784
210.0457530.5490.291916

\begin{tabular}{lllllllll}
\hline
Partial Autocorrelation Function \tabularnewline
Time lag k & PACF(k) & T-STAT & P-value \tabularnewline
1 & 0.948047 & 11.3766 & 0 \tabularnewline
2 & -0.229422 & -2.7531 & 0.003332 \tabularnewline
3 & 0.038148 & 0.4578 & 0.323903 \tabularnewline
4 & 0.093785 & 1.1254 & 0.131141 \tabularnewline
5 & 0.073607 & 0.8833 & 0.189279 \tabularnewline
6 & 0.007728 & 0.0927 & 0.463123 \tabularnewline
7 & 0.125597 & 1.5072 & 0.066979 \tabularnewline
8 & 0.089951 & 1.0794 & 0.141103 \tabularnewline
9 & 0.232489 & 2.7899 & 0.002994 \tabularnewline
10 & 0.166051 & 1.9926 & 0.024097 \tabularnewline
11 & 0.171274 & 2.0553 & 0.020829 \tabularnewline
12 & -0.135431 & -1.6252 & 0.053156 \tabularnewline
13 & -0.539691 & -6.4763 & 0 \tabularnewline
14 & -0.02661 & -0.3193 & 0.374973 \tabularnewline
15 & 0.090765 & 1.0892 & 0.138947 \tabularnewline
16 & 0.024956 & 0.2995 & 0.382508 \tabularnewline
17 & 0.032516 & 0.3902 & 0.348487 \tabularnewline
18 & 0.073433 & 0.8812 & 0.189841 \tabularnewline
19 & 0.048442 & 0.5813 & 0.280972 \tabularnewline
20 & -0.045542 & -0.5465 & 0.292784 \tabularnewline
21 & 0.045753 & 0.549 & 0.291916 \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{tabular}
%Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=2

[TABLE]
[ROW][C]Partial Autocorrelation Function[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]Time lag k[/C][C]PACF(k)[/C][C]T-STAT[/C][C]P-value[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]1[/C][C]0.948047[/C][C]11.3766[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]2[/C][C]-0.229422[/C][C]-2.7531[/C][C]0.003332[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]3[/C][C]0.038148[/C][C]0.4578[/C][C]0.323903[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]4[/C][C]0.093785[/C][C]1.1254[/C][C]0.131141[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]5[/C][C]0.073607[/C][C]0.8833[/C][C]0.189279[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]6[/C][C]0.007728[/C][C]0.0927[/C][C]0.463123[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]7[/C][C]0.125597[/C][C]1.5072[/C][C]0.066979[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]8[/C][C]0.089951[/C][C]1.0794[/C][C]0.141103[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]9[/C][C]0.232489[/C][C]2.7899[/C][C]0.002994[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]10[/C][C]0.166051[/C][C]1.9926[/C][C]0.024097[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]11[/C][C]0.171274[/C][C]2.0553[/C][C]0.020829[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]12[/C][C]-0.135431[/C][C]-1.6252[/C][C]0.053156[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]13[/C][C]-0.539691[/C][C]-6.4763[/C][C]0[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]14[/C][C]-0.02661[/C][C]-0.3193[/C][C]0.374973[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]15[/C][C]0.090765[/C][C]1.0892[/C][C]0.138947[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]16[/C][C]0.024956[/C][C]0.2995[/C][C]0.382508[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]17[/C][C]0.032516[/C][C]0.3902[/C][C]0.348487[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]18[/C][C]0.073433[/C][C]0.8812[/C][C]0.189841[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]19[/C][C]0.048442[/C][C]0.5813[/C][C]0.280972[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]20[/C][C]-0.045542[/C][C]-0.5465[/C][C]0.292784[/C][/ROW]
[ROW][C]21[/C][C]0.045753[/C][C]0.549[/C][C]0.291916[/C][/ROW]
[/TABLE]
Source: https://freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=2

Globally Unique Identifier (entire table): ba.freestatistics.org/blog/index.php?pk=28586&T=2

As an alternative you can also use a QR Code:  

The GUIDs for individual cells are displayed in the table below:

Partial Autocorrelation Function
Time lag kPACF(k)T-STATP-value
10.94804711.37660
2-0.229422-2.75310.003332
30.0381480.45780.323903
40.0937851.12540.131141
50.0736070.88330.189279
60.0077280.09270.463123
70.1255971.50720.066979
80.0899511.07940.141103
90.2324892.78990.002994
100.1660511.99260.024097
110.1712742.05530.020829
12-0.135431-1.62520.053156
13-0.539691-6.47630
14-0.02661-0.31930.374973
150.0907651.08920.138947
160.0249560.29950.382508
170.0325160.39020.348487
180.0734330.88120.189841
190.0484420.58130.280972
20-0.045542-0.54650.292784
210.0457530.5490.291916



Parameters (Session):
par1 = Default ; par2 = 1 ; par3 = 0 ; par4 = 0 ; par5 = 12 ;
Parameters (R input):
par1 = Default ; par2 = 1 ; par3 = 0 ; par4 = 0 ; par5 = 12 ;
R code (references can be found in the software module):
if (par1 == 'Default') {
par1 = 10*log10(length(x))
} else {
par1 <- as.numeric(par1)
}
par2 <- as.numeric(par2)
par3 <- as.numeric(par3)
par4 <- as.numeric(par4)
par5 <- as.numeric(par5)
if (par2 == 0) {
x <- log(x)
} else {
x <- (x ^ par2 - 1) / par2
}
if (par3 > 0) x <- diff(x,lag=1,difference=par3)
if (par4 > 0) x <- diff(x,lag=par5,difference=par4)
bitmap(file='pic1.png')
racf <- acf(x,par1,main='Autocorrelation',xlab='lags',ylab='ACF')
dev.off()
bitmap(file='pic2.png')
rpacf <- pacf(x,par1,main='Partial Autocorrelation',xlab='lags',ylab='PACF')
dev.off()
(myacf <- c(racf$acf))
(mypacf <- c(rpacf$acf))
lengthx <- length(x)
sqrtn <- sqrt(lengthx)
load(file='createtable')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Autocorrelation Function',4,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Time lag k',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('basics.htm','ACF(k)','click here for more information about the Autocorrelation Function'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'T-STAT',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'P-value',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
for (i in 2:(par1+1)) {
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,i-1,header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,round(myacf[i],6))
mytstat <- myacf[i]*sqrtn
a<-table.element(a,round(mytstat,4))
a<-table.element(a,round(1-pt(abs(mytstat),lengthx),6))
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable.tab')
a<-table.start()
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Partial Autocorrelation Function',4,TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,'Time lag k',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,hyperlink('basics.htm','PACF(k)','click here for more information about the Partial Autocorrelation Function'),header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'T-STAT',header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,'P-value',header=TRUE)
a<-table.row.end(a)
for (i in 1:par1) {
a<-table.row.start(a)
a<-table.element(a,i,header=TRUE)
a<-table.element(a,round(mypacf[i],6))
mytstat <- mypacf[i]*sqrtn
a<-table.element(a,round(mytstat,4))
a<-table.element(a,round(1-pt(abs(mytstat),lengthx),6))
a<-table.row.end(a)
}
a<-table.end(a)
table.save(a,file='mytable1.tab')